О мире во всем мире.
What both of these camps overlook is that the sort of missile defenses that the United States might plausibly deploy would be valuable primarily in an offensive context, not a defensive one -- as an adjunct to a U.S. first-strike capability, not as a standalone shield. If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal -- if any at all. At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left.
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060301faessay85204-p30/keir-a-lieber-daryl-g-press/the-rise-of-u-s-nuclear-primacy.html
Вывод только один - США должны быть уничтожены. Мы должны нажать на кнопку первыми. Если миру суждено сгореть, то пусть он сгорит вместе с Америкой а не без нее.
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20060301faessay85204-p30/keir-a-lieber-daryl-g-press/the-rise-of-u-s-nuclear-primacy.html
Вывод только один - США должны быть уничтожены. Мы должны нажать на кнопку первыми. Если миру суждено сгореть, то пусть он сгорит вместе с Америкой а не без нее.